HHABenchTechSpecs.htmlTEXTR*chñBCµ›¿“µ›¿“ÅÅ„ˆ CESLab 3.0 HHA Bench Series Technical Specifications

CESLab 3.0
HHA Bench Series Technical Specifications

Mark Stevans
CESI
http://www.cesinst.com

September 5, 2000

1. Introduction

The HHA series of predefined Benches contains adult human heart models for use with CESLab 3.0. As delivered, the Preparation parameters are set for simulated normal cardiac activation and recovery, but the model includes a number of simulated pathologies which may be activated if desired.

As distributed with the CESLab application, the Cell Size employed in the Cell Set "Myocardial Cell Set" is 2.0 mm. This relatively low resolution renders the files compact for rapid downloading, and insures that even users with low-memory hardware configurations can open the benches and conduct Trials. Surface Potential Transfer Coefficients were generated with 2 iterations of the procedure of Gelernter and Swihart (G&S), with Surface Potential Mapping enabled for all employed polyhedra.

If desired, the user can regenerate the Cell Set at a higher resolution (i.e., a lower Cell Size), but note that higher resolutions use much more free memory, and may require significant CPU time. Note that the Surface Potential Transfer Coefficients must be regenerated if the Cell Set is regenerated, which may require significant CPU time; the number of G&S iterations may be reduced to zero and Surface Potential Mapping disabled for all polyhedra to speed this process.

The cardiac shapes employed by the HHA Benches are, in general, drawn from the high-resolution sampled data of Lorange and Gulrajani (courtesy of Drs. Lorange and Gulrajani and the University of Montreal), but note that the CESLab simulation algorithms and electrophysiological parameters of the HHA Preparations differ significantly from those employed by Lorange and Gulrajani.

2. Bench-Wide Parameters

2.1. Regional Dipole Exclusion Radius

As delivered, the regional dipole exclusion radius is set at 2 cm, yielding approximately 86 Regional Dipoles.

2.2. Dipole Sampling Interval

The Dipole Sampling Interval is set at 1.0 ms.

2.3. Vertical Phase 2 Duration Gradient

The vertical phase 2 duration gradient is set at -.3 s/m.

2.4. Decremental Conduction Curves

A single, non-tissue type-specific Decremental Conduction curve has been defined. It ranges from a minimum conduction speed factor of .16 at zero Phase 3RRP offset, to unity at 500 ms, and reaches the maximum factor of 1.03 at 700 ms.

2.5. Interval/Potential Curves

A single, non-tissue type-specific Interval/Potential curve has been defined. It ranges from a minimum factor of about .8 to unity at 750 ms, and reaches its maximum factor of 1.1 at 2300 ms.

2.6. Interval/Duration Curves

A single, non-tissue type-specific Interval/Duration curve has been defined. It ranges from a minimum duration factor of .5 to unity at 750 ms, and reaches the maximum of 1.4 at 2300 ms.

3. Preparation Component Objects

Each HHA Preparation contains the standard CESLab THA torso model, as described in the document CESLab Torso Model Technical Specifications. In addition, HHA Preparations contain the following components:

3.1. Tissue Types

All Tissue Type action potential waveforms have been taken from Katz.

1 ms was selected as the duration of phase 0 for all rapidly-depolarizing Tissue Types (myocardial, His, and Purkinje).

As delivered, HHA Benches contain no tissue type-specific decremental conduction, interval/potential, or interval/duration curves.

The following Tissue Types are considered part of the HHA Preparation:

3.2. Subtissues

Excitation thresholds have been set to the smallest value (-12 mV) that reliably rejects spontaneous reactivation when the activation waveforms of Katz are employed.

The following Subtissues are defined in HHA preparations:

3.3. Polyhedra

The intracavitary polyhedra are the only polyhedra particular to the HHA preparations, and exist to approximate the intracavitary blood masses for the purposes of surface potential transfer coefficient generation:

ElectroWorld Viewer showing the modelled Intracavitary Polyhedra and the Regional Dipoles, depicted in their normal rotation within the torso model.

Click on image to enlarge.

Their shapes are defined by the correspondingly named shapes in compound shape "Heart CompoundShape". They closely follow the contours of the four chambers, while remaining at least .5 cm from the myocardial walls and from each other at all points. They may be edited by the user as desired using the embedded shape editor. The maximum facet size for each intracavitary polyhedron is set at .5 cm, yielding a total of about 1000 facets. The test script "Test Intracavitary Polyhedra" indicates that the simulation results at this resolution are accurate (i.e. very close to results at higher resolutions), yet the number of facets is low enough to enable the number of G&S iterations to be set to non-zero values without consuming excessive computational resources (time and memory).

3.4. Compound Shapes

There is only one Compound Shape particular to the HHA Benches: Heart Compound Shape. This compound shape contains all geometric data used to generate the various Cell Sets, as well as the intracavitary polyhedra.

Shape Editor showing the controlling geometry of the heart as seen in a superior cutaway view at the middle of the heart. The shapes may be modified as desired to alter the cardiac geometry, automatically regenerating each of the modelled Cell Sets at their respective Cell Sizes.

Click on image to enlarge.

This compound shape may be edited by the user as desired to change the geometry of the heart model.

3.5. Matrices

There is only one matrix defined for the HHA preparations: Heart Transformation Matrix. It maps the Cartesian space of the heart to that of the torso.

The placement of the heart within the torso was selected after Gulrajani and Mailloux. The center of the heart model is at the level of the fifth intercostal space. Additionally, the heart is translated 1 cm to the left, and 1 cm forward.

The matrix contains the following sequence of rotations (each clockwise as seen looking from points along the positive basis vector towards the origin):

This matrix can be edited to change the position (rotation and translation) of the heart (the intracavitary polyhedra and Regional Dipoless) within the torso model in the ElectroWorld, but care must be taken to insure that no Regional Dipoles are moved too close to the lung or torso polyhedra. The menu bar command Report Facet Proximities can be used to directly examine the distances between Dipole Source Locations (DSL) and the nearest polyhedral facets. A series of Trials may also be conducted with slightly differing Regional Dipole Exclusion Radii (causing different DSL positioning) to check for consistency of results.

Rescaling this matrix will not simulate changes in heart size, and is not recommended.

3.6. Cell Sets

The following Cell Sets are defined for this Preparation:

3.7. Cell Junctions

The various Cell Sets are joined by the following junctions:

4. Simulation of Normal Cardiac Cycle

The simulated normal cardiac cycle starts at SA Nodes 1-3, which all activate within a 10 ms interval. Atrial activation is complete in 120 ms (after Lorange and Gulrajani). A 50 ms atrioventricular delay is provided by slow conduction in the Penetrating Bundle. Ventricular activation in the HHA preparation begins at 160 ms after the start of the cardiac cycle (after Lorange et al) at about the junction of the middle and apical thirds of the left side of the ventricular septum (after Durrer), followed shortly by right ventricular free wall activation near the apex. ECG output indicates a frontal plane axis of approximately 30 degrees.

An ECG Viewer showing the frontal lead tracings generated by a simulated normal cardiac cycle.

Click on image to enlarge.

An ECG Viewer showing the precordial lead tracings generated by a simulated normal cardiac cycle.

Click on image to enlarge.

5. Bench Scripts

The following Bench Scripts are included in HHA benches:

6. References

Bacharova L (1993). Atlas of Clinical Vectorcardiography. Kabel Publishers, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Boineau JP, Schuessler RB, Mooney CR, Wylds AC, Miller CB, Hudson RD, Borremans JM, Brockus CW (1978). Multicentric origin of the atrial depolarization wave: The pacemaker complex. Relation to dynamics of atrial conduction, P-wave changes and heart rate control. Circulation 58(6): 1036-48.

Burgess MJ, Green LS, Millar K, Wyatt R, Abildskov JA (1972). The sequence of normal ventricular recovery. Am Heart J 84(5): 660-669.

Durrer D, van Dam RT, Freud GE, Janse MJ, Miejler FL, Arzbaecher RC (1970). Total excitation of the isolated human heart. Circulation 41: 899-912.

Eckner FAO, Brown BW, Davidson DL, Glagov S (1969). Dimensions of normal human hearts. Arch Pathol 88: 497-507.

Gelernter HL, Swihart JC (1964). A mathematical-physical model of the genesis of the electrocardiogram. Biophys J 4: 285-301.

Gulrajani RM, Mailloux GE (1983). A simulation study of the effects of torso inhomogeneities on electrocardiographic potentials, using realistic heart and torso models. Circ Res 52: 45-56.

Gulrajani RM, Pham-Huy H, Nadeau RA, Savard P, de Guise J, Primeau RE, Roberge FA (1984). Application of the single moving dipole inverse solution to the study of the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in man. J Electrocardiol 17(3): 271-88.

Katz AM (1992). Physiology of the Heart. Raven Press, New York. Lorange M, Gulrajani R (1993). A computer heart model incorporating anisotropic propagation. J Electrocardiol 26(4): 245- 77.

Lorange M, Gulrajani R (1993). A computer heart model incorporating anisotropic propagation. J Electrocardiol 26(4): 245- 77.

Myerburg RJ, Nilsson K, Gelband H (1972) Physiology of canine intraventricular conduction and endocardial excitation. Circ Res 30: 217-243.

Nagao K, Toyama J, Kodama I, Yamada K (1981). Role of the conduction system in the endocardial excitation spread in the right ventricle. Am J Cardiol 48: 864-870.

Roberts DE, Hersh LT, Scher AM (1979). Influence of cardiac fiber orientation on wavefront voltage, conduction velocity, and tissue resistivity in the dog. Circ Res 44: 701-12.

Streeter DD Jr, Spotnitz HM, Patel DP, Ross J Jr., Sonnenblick EH (1969). Fiber orientation in the canine left ventricle during diastole and systole. Circ Res 24: 339-47.

Waller BF, Taliercio CP, Slack JD, Orr CM, Howard J, Smith ML (1990). Tomographic views of normal and abnormal hearts: the anatomic basis for various cardiac imaging techniques. Part I. Clin Cardiol 13: 804-12.

Waller BF, Taliercio CP, Slack JD, Orr CM, Howard J, Smith ML (1990). Tomographic views of normal and abnormal hearts: the anatomic basis for various cardiac imaging techniques. Part II. Clin Cardiol 13: 877-84.

Waller BF, Schlant RC (1994). Anatomy of the heart. In: Schlant RC, Alexander RW (eds): Hurst's The Heart. New York, McGraw-Hill: 59- 111.

Wyndham CR, Meeran MK, Smith T, Saxena A, Engleman RM, Levitsky S, Rosen KM (1978). Epicardial activation of the intact human heart without conduction defect. Circulation 59: 161-68.

7. Acknowledgements

High-resolution (1 mm cubic) cardiac geometric data acquired from CAT scans was made available by Ramesh Gulrajani, PhD, Michel Lorange, PhD, and the University of Montreal.

Thanks also to Ronald Edwards. 2 Mark Stevans2;}¶‰B2STR ø„ˇˇ;}߇